Tag Archives: Reform in China

China bound for reform or repeating history?

19 Mar

Was Bo Xilai an enforcer of justice on the corrupt or a corrupt enforcer of justice?

In reading up on some of the fallout from China’s NPC and CPPCC, I keep coming back to this one particular quote. Early in the Qin dynasty, the man perhaps most responsible for the creation of singular Chinese state, Lord Shang, wrote:

To club together and keep your mouth shut is to be good; to be alienated from and spy on each other is to be a scoundrel. If you glorify the good, errors will be hidden; if you put scoundrels in charge, crime will be punished. (Fairbank)

So then the question becomes, who is the scoundrel? Is it better to hide errors and be thought of as good? Is it better to empower the scoundrel if it means justice will be wrought?

Is Bo Xilai a scoundrel or was he just part of the club? Is the CCP a club, or a scoundrel in its own right? Is China better of with a scoundrel at the head? Is justice worth suffering at the hands of that scoundrel?

 

Air China VP talks Future of US-China relations

8 Aug

One of Air China’s top brass recently gave a speech in Los Angeles, drawing attention to how politicians and media muddy the path to a better understanding between Americans and Chinese.

The entire article is worth a read, bringing up some interesting points on “unobvious” interrelations, FDI, currency manipulation, progress in China, human rights, freedom of the press, tourism, democracy, capitalism– you name it.

I particularly liked this passage, discussing how any alleged currency manipulation is unlikely to return jobs to the US, a point often missed by fear-mongers in the Western media:

The danger, however, is to let our disagreements dominate our agreements. And our politicians and the media have done a grossly inadequate job of helping the public understand what’s really going on and helping them put things in perspective. Instead, barbs are lobbed back and forth on the airwaves and the atmosphere of the U.S.-China relationship continues to be poisoned.

For example, politicians and the media accuse China of stealing jobs from American workers by manipulating the Chinese currency. China started to peg the yuan to the dollar in January 1994. How did our politicians and the media just wake up to the currency manipulation issue now? Also, will the yuan’s appreciation win back American jobs? Probably not, because the root of the problem is capitalism itself. Capital by nature will go after the maximum profit. Sure enough, as the yuan has been appreciating about 25 percent in the last few years, the unemployment in the export manufacturing sector in China has shot up as expected. But have those jobs come back to the United States?

We don’t know. According to a Wall Street Journal article titled “Who Gains, Who Loses,” some of them are going to Vietnam because American capital has found a new haven for low cost and cheap labor there, just as it has made its way over the years from Japan, to Singapore, to Hong Kong, to South Korea, to Taiwan, and eventually to China.

Boom & Bust: The Story of Eco-cities in China

25 May

Every once in a while I like to ruffle people’s feathers by calling China the most progressive country in the world. Is it? I wouldn’t even know how to begin qualifying that statement, but certainly, from a quantitative view, China is the Vin Diesel of reform: fast and furious, hit and miss.

All aboard the bus to a greener future in China!

One thing I admire about the Chinese is their sense of urgency. In a country increasingly eco-ambitious, the government’s efforts to tackle social and environmental issues have been forthright. History’s largest urbanization has forced the CCP’s hand, but it has– at least domestically– shown plenty of bravado.

The Project 2049 Institute recently took a look at the boom-and-bust nature of China’s on-going efforts to build sustainable eco-cities. The article, “The Rise of China’s Eco-cities: A Harbinger of a Sustainable Future?”, does a laudable job of providing some perspective to the country’s pursuits.

If successfully implemented, China’s efforts at constructing eco-cities would not only revamp the urban landscape and improve high-density living conditions, but also reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change. China’s eco-construction sector is an attractive, profitable investment opportunity despite the existence of bureaucratic boundaries, but such projects are at risk of failure due to abandonment, unaffordability, poor management, and lack of local expertise.

China had as many as 168 eco-projects underway by last year, according to the institute.  In a country nearing the brink of complete ecological collapse, the scale of the solution must match that of the problem: massive.

Now, there’s a lot of rhetoric to sort through when it comes to discussing the environment in China and how it’s handling eco-crises. Let me say this, while the government certainly didn’t do itself any favors in Copenhagen a few years back, it did what it had to. As long as the economy is stable, the CCP will have plenty of spare change to drop on projects like eco-cities and to invest in green technology. These guys aren’t imbeciles. They can see the writing on the wall– it’s in green crayon. A child could read it.

The message, to paraphrase GG, is clear: “Green is good.” It’s going to line the pockets of the next great superpower. So, yes, the question so often repeated is a valid one: Is China going to lead the world’s green economy?

Tough to say at this point– but I haven’t heard of 168 eco-cities under construction in the US.

Thoughts on Ai Weiwei’s Arrest

18 Apr

Julen Madariaga has a few interesting thoughts on who the West chooses as its poster-protesters and how it often does not reflect the type of reform most Chinese support.

Many of us who (mildly) oppose all this Ai Weiwei fad don’t do so on the grounds of irrelevance, but for other more important reasons.  In particular, we fear that the disproportionate focus of Western media on characters like Nobel Liu XB or Ai WW is counterproductive, and it can undermine the democratic dissidence in China.

…The point is, Liu and Ai do not stand for what most open-minded Chinese people want: pragmatic policy and progressive change. We choose to highlight these two characters not because they represent a Chinese ideal, but because they represent our ideal of  what the average Chinese dissident should be. And I am afraid, by doing so we are pushing China even further apart from us.

Check out the post and the original article on Ai’s detention by Evan Osnos, as well as this on Fear of a Red Planet.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 76 other followers

%d bloggers like this: