Tag Archives: KMT

62hrs ’til Taiwan’s presidential election: DPP deception!

11 Jan

Wow. Real curve ball, here! It hasn’t shaken my support of the DPP or my faith in Tsai Ying-wen’s (蔡英文) presidential ability, but…

Chen Ting-fei (陳亭妃completely fooled me into thinking she might be cute with this campaign poster!It’s been up for months right outside my apartment, and, ya know, puts a smile on my face every morning on the way to work. Like, look at this team of ladies! Now that’s something I can endorse, beauty and brains! Boom!

Turns out, it’s yet another case of the dreaded “Great campaign photo/Not-so-great Google search” (shaking my head). Nooooo!

I mean, as a citizen of Tainan, she still gets my vote. I haven’t seen any sure-fire Palins rolling out on the KMT ticket, so Chen’s vote is safe with me. Plus, I kinda dig the fact that she used to be in television. It’s as if she took my exact career path, except actually accomplished everything I ever wanted to achieve.

But even after all this, and in true Taiwanese political spirit, I’ll still give her a patented fist-pump!

 

P.S. Does this post totally kill my Taiwanese political credibility???

 

New Wikileaks cables highlight PRC v. ROC “No-Consensus Consensus”

8 Sep

To-may-to. To-mah-to. If you enjoying reading infuriatingly obfuscated political speak, you need to be following this Wikileaks/’92 Consensus story:

While President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has reiterated that the so-called “1992 consensus” was reached by Taiwan and China in 1992 to the effect that each side recognizes “one China, with each side having its own interpretation,” US cables recently released by WikiLeaks show that Chinese officials and academics clearly have a different understanding on what constitutes the “consensus.”

So, here’s how I see this– and I could be totally wrong. If I am, feel free to set me straight. But it goes something like this…

Way back in 1992, the PRC and ROC got together for a cross-strait chat. Both sides made their points, and it ended in the PRC basically telling the ROC to go fly a kite.

The KMT came out of this, hoping not to lose face politically, twisting it into a half-win. “Hey guys, no, don’t worry, we got this. Yeah, they’re cool, ya know, we just said, ‘Yeah, you got your story. We’ve got ours,’ but everything is cool.”

This lunacy was further wrenched, wringing out the obvious truth, into a nice, dry political buzz word: “the 1992 Consensus”– a.k.a. “The No-Consensus Consensus.”

Because, as far as China is concerned, then and now, there is nothing to discuss: There is one China. It is controlled and governed by the PRC. Taiwan is a province of that country. The PRC is allowing a local government of that province to play some meaningless game of political charades before it all ends in an ultimate unification.

Taiwan is the little grandchild tugging on Grandpa China’s pantleg. Sort of annoying, but he’s just letting it slide because, hey, it’s family, and he’s got a lot invested in it carrying on the bloodline.

That’s how China sees it. There is no agree-to-disagree here. It’s a “disagree-to-agree-to-disagree.” See how that works?

President Ma and the KMT keep hammering this “1992 Consensus” line like a whack-a-mole game, and I just don’t get it. First of all, how has this been spun as consensus? Or an accomplishment? Or a legit policy stance?

Do I think either party in Taiwan has a much stronger leg to stand on? Eh, not really. But this whole “consensus” mumbojumbo is for the birds.

Yeah, the PRC kind of has the ROC by the balls here. But hey, that’s what happens when you lose a civil war in a continent-sized country and retreat to a tiny little island. The window to announce independence probably closed in the early 1970s.

What can be done now? Well, hopefully something a little more creative and constructive than basing the most important policy you have on agreeing to disagree, and not even really at that.

Memories of Fleeing Mainland China

6 Aug

Salon recently posted this semi-interesting article on a 97-year-old Chinese Civil War vet. I only knock the article because it seems a little shallow, at least in addressing the personal reflections of this man’s life. It reads like a history refresher.

Through most of the 1950s, even as China regularly shelled a group of islands held by Taiwan, Wei believed Chiang’s promise that the Nationalists would soon attack across the Taiwan Strait and defeat the communists.

“We used bamboo chairs, desks and beds that were built to last only two or three years,” he says, reflecting the prevailing feeling that Taiwan was a temporary home.

But it got me thinking.

Living in China, or maybe just growing older, helped me develop a deeper appreciation for what people have lived through. Particularly in China, over the last century, the change has been tumultuous, radical.

I remember living in Shanghai, walking down random soon-to-be-gentrified alleys, passing elderly Chinese sitting outside their homes. Old folks, chill in a chair outside all day, waiting for friends to pass, playing cards, hunched over eerily motionless.

Those wrinkled eyes have seen a lot. From the fall of the Qing, to the start of the Civil War, the Japanese invasion, more Civil War, famine, poverty, death… the eventual opening up of China, rapid economic growth, hope, pride returned… There they are sitting in the shade of Shanghai’s modern skyscrapers, largely forgotten and ignored– tiny, frail, weathered, with nothing but their own thoughts.

For those on the other side, a totally different but equally confusing fate await them. In this man’s case, to have been a soldier fleeing the mainland, seeking refuge on this strange island, establishing a semi-permanent life, never really knowing if a war was right around the corner… it’s intense. This article just doesn’t do justice to this momentous history.

Elections in (the Other) China

23 Nov Is it first-come-first-serve for these spots?
It’s a sneak-peek to the world’s most anticipated drama: elections in China.

Campaign flags and banners streaming on a pedestrian overpass near my house.

The other “China,” the Republic of, Taiwan, will hold nationwide municipal elections this Saturday, November 27. Politicians, organizers, and citizens have been taking to the streets in Taipei for the last few weeks, once again showing the world what “Chinese” democracy really looks like.

If one could deduce what democratic elections in the PRC would look like, the West’s incessant preoccupation, wouldn’t looking at one of Asia’s most successful democracies be a solid starting point?

Taiwan’s elections highlight the joint efforts of a vibrant, emerging democratic society. I cannot impress upon friends back home exactly how confusing and yet wholly inspiring it is for an American to witness the process here; to witness anything political here.

Taiwan mobilizes with an ease I have never seen. These are metropolitan elections, the equivalent of the US mid-term Congressionals. But besides the ubiquitous rectangular Name-’Year signs and the odd town hall gathering, you don’t see a lot of mobilization in the States– even in this time of Tea Partiers, Palins, and other assorted sociopaths.

Taiwan is noisy. Colorful. And noisy.

Flags fly everywhere. Long vertical streams line every median, any inch of non-concrete. Billboards– happy, smiley, slogany– cover the dingy bareness of Taiwan’s concrete cityscape.

The sheer number of flags and billboards is astonishing. Prime location: Pedestrian overpasses. Yet, amazingly, I have never seen violence over this flagpole paradise. I would expect it in China, where people feel entitled to take and use without an inkling of concern for others. You see in the States, to an extent; one truck drives down the street plunging signs into the roadside and a half-mile back an opposing party truck crawls along plucking them out.

Translating the slogans splashed on this party paraphernalia is one of the little joys of my morning commute. They range from your run-of-the-mill “老经验,新活力” (roughly: Old experience, new energy), to the more cutesy “台湾的女儿” (Taiwan’s daughter), to the more emotive about children’s futures, safety, and new dreams.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

But above all, what makes Taiwanese elections so seemingly Chinese? Loudspeaker trucks.

Between signs and smells, it is tough to say which of the two senses faces a rougher transition when living in China or Taiwan. In Shanghai, I would awake to an old man on a bicycle riding through my neighborhood at 6am every morning. Strapped to his self-made bicycle/truck would be an old tape deck blaring (the amazingly invariable) prerecorded call for recycling of large household items… “冰箱!洗衣机!电视机!”

Taiwanese elections have the loudspeakers on bicycles and scooters, but mostly on vans. Larger than a golf cart and smaller than a Rav-4, these vans set cruise control to a snail’s pace and canvass city streets. Covered in decorative flags and miniature billboards, they boast the name, number, and slogan of their respective candidates. Through the loudspeaker, almost always indistinguishable over the clamor of traffic, the politician waxes on about issues essential to their election chances.

The stakes are increasing as election day nears. Today, a full parade of these vans, flanked by larger troop carrying trucks, inched its way down my street at lunch time. Scouts sprinted ahead of the platoon to lay explosive charges (fireworks?) along the road, a precursor to the drum-banging hootin’-and-hollerin’ of the battle-clad supporters in the back of the convoy.

The whole spectacle is part parade, part noise pollution– all exuberant.

It reminds me of when I saw a get-out-the-vote parade in Mozambique just prior to its 2005 presidential elections. A bunch of maniacs on scooters decked out with streamers and party flags raced through the streets of Maputo honking their horns. An armored Toyota Landcruiser took position in the middle of the mob. I happened to be on the street when the convoy screamed past. As I turned, shocked and fearful, I had just enough time to snap a blurred shot of eventual-winner Armando Guebuza propped out of the sunroof, waving with one hand and holding on for dear life with the other.

Democracy isn’t a one-size-fits-all. No one knows what democracy in China may one day resemble. But Taiwan is already the portrait of what peaceful, energetic, and progressive elections look like right in China’s backyard.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 76 other followers

%d bloggers like this: