Tag Archives: Chinese democracy

CCP Will Not Fall

21 Feb

 

Police talk to a couple of men filming interviews in Chengdu's central Tianfu square while I was on vacation there last year.

Don’t hold your breath. Recent news of protests in China will not amount to revolutionary change as seen in the Middle East. But damn you, CCP, for perpetuating this interminable argumentative paradox.

 

It’s safe to say that most foreigners who have earned the expatriate title living in China have a love-hate relationship with the country. Obviously, most find enough weight on the pro side of the scale to remain. Still the vicissitudes of daily life provide ample sway.

While in China, friends and I seem to spend an inordinate amount of time blasting the inconsistent rationality of most things Chinese. Yet, as soon as I return home, the tables turn. I find myself unwittingly and yet seemingly forced to defend China, warts and all.

A perfect example of this behavioral paradox manifested itself this weekend. I was reading Michael Turton’s blog, a man I generally agree with and find quite insightful. He posted something to the effect of the Confucius Institute is a covert international spy network set up by the CCP. It was bold, and reaching; I saved the link.

China’s lack of an exportable (soft) culture is seen as a huge hole in its PR toolbox. There are plans aplenty to rectify this. For instance, the government has promised millions in funding to try to set up a 24-hour English news channel a la BBC or CNN. The idea being that it could spread the “China voice,” more effectively exposing the world to the country’s (read: the CCP’s) opinion on international matters. The Confucius Institute, essentially a mandarin language center, has been the party’s most successful attempt at garnering an allegedly non-political and respectable Chinese presence abroad.

It should come as no surprise that candidates hoping to work for the institute are thoroughly vetted by the supervising body. Foremost is the increasingly illogical yet persistent fear of a country offering a visa to a Chinese who might defect and never return home. But beyond that, I am sure the powers that be want those representing the country to be loyal and patriotic– as would any state-run enterprise abroad.

Stories of spy games and blacklisting seem to me unsubstantiated at best and not surprising to say the least. To assume government organizations abroad are not players in international policy is foolish. Not to sound like a conspiracy theorist myself, but I think US history (most notably Central and South America) assures us that our own “national interests” have met these means over the years.

So right as I was about to post this rebuttal, the CCP went ahead and made itself look like an asshole again locking up alleged dissidents for fear of Middle East-inspired protests. I certainly don’t condone or support this effort, yet it also doesn’t surprise me.

Unlike the Northern African nations who are just now realizing they played their cards wrong, the CCP has China by the balls. The New York Times and others calling the crack down a show of “nervousness” is more than a stretch. Reports peg the number of arrests and lockdowns at around 90. Mind you that Chinese authorities could arrest the entire population of Bahrain, Libya, Tunisia and Egypt combined and there would still be 1.2 billion people going about business as usual.

The amazing, albeit horrifying, aspect of these events is the individual willingness within the police state to crack down on dissidents. There must be at least a few intelligence officers who go home at night and scrub their hands until they bleed. But for whatever reason, I imagine that number to be practically infinitesimal. The fact that unknown streams of normal netizens log on as pro bono nationalist hackers is a quick reminder of how strong support for the party remains.

So come what may of these arrests, the CCP isn’t going to flinch. These North African regimes are falling because they have failed to provide basic societal needs– security and opportunity. While they have ignored festering tensions among the masses, the CCP has not. There is a brutal mastery in manipulation of public accord, a wave of the wand China knows well.

The Perils of Free Speech

14 Feb

A “controversial legal action” is testing the definition of free speech in Taiwan, and it speaks to the role speech plays in a mass media democracy.

According to the Taipei Times,

The Taipei Prosecutors’ Office on Friday began handling a request by the Department of Health (DOH) to prosecute seven talk show pundits and a physician for allegedly spreading rumors about the influenza A(H1N1) flu vaccine… Contending that their sensational allegations made people reluctant to get vaccinated and left some vulnerable to severe bouts of flu and even death… If indicted and found guilty, each of the pundits is subject to a fine of up to NT$500,000 (US$17,100).

Freedom of speech is a necessary caveat to any successful experiment in democracy, or so the old line holds. But what if that isn’t completely true?

A friend emailed me the Time article, “Why China Does Capitalism Better than the US”  a few weeks ago. I found it an accurate and balanced account of economic development on the other side of the strait, and the facts are hard to argue. “Capitalism with Chinese principles” has not only endured the economic crisis, but it has laid the infrastructure for continued prosperity in the next decade.

Watching Obama’s State of the Union address, I felt it was all too disconnected. It seemed like he was trying to write the next great speech, trying to pander to political constituencies, trying to show the big picture at a time when Congress can’t trigger a point-and-shoot.

Meanwhile, China is in position to lead the world economy in solar, wind, and hydrological energy. It’s already laid the track for the world’s best train system and is rapidly reforming its education and health care systems. As Francis Fukyama told Financial Times in an op-ed titled, “US democracy has little to teach China,”

Many Chinese see their weathering of the financial crisis as a vindication of their own system, and the beginning of an era in which US-style liberal ideas will no longer be dominant.

But what does this have to do with freedom of speech? Attached at the bottom of the article my friend sent me was a link to Scott Adams’ blog and a post titled “Freedom of Data.” Adams went on to talk about how freedom of speech in China is limited in its socio-political system for the benefit of the greater good, an undoubtedly contentious point.

But taking a look at the situation here in Taiwan, it is rather refreshing to see media members and pundits held accountable for false information detrimental to the populace at large. We were reminded of how vitriol can lead to violence with the assassination attempt in Arizona. Still, political pundits in the US are seldom criticized for incorrect or misleading information, let alone punished for the consequences.

Maybe American democracy has something to learn from this side of the globe.

Elections in (the Other) China

23 Nov Is it first-come-first-serve for these spots?
It’s a sneak-peek to the world’s most anticipated drama: elections in China.

Campaign flags and banners streaming on a pedestrian overpass near my house.

The other “China,” the Republic of, Taiwan, will hold nationwide municipal elections this Saturday, November 27. Politicians, organizers, and citizens have been taking to the streets in Taipei for the last few weeks, once again showing the world what “Chinese” democracy really looks like.

If one could deduce what democratic elections in the PRC would look like, the West’s incessant preoccupation, wouldn’t looking at one of Asia’s most successful democracies be a solid starting point?

Taiwan’s elections highlight the joint efforts of a vibrant, emerging democratic society. I cannot impress upon friends back home exactly how confusing and yet wholly inspiring it is for an American to witness the process here; to witness anything political here.

Taiwan mobilizes with an ease I have never seen. These are metropolitan elections, the equivalent of the US mid-term Congressionals. But besides the ubiquitous rectangular Name-’Year signs and the odd town hall gathering, you don’t see a lot of mobilization in the States– even in this time of Tea Partiers, Palins, and other assorted sociopaths.

Taiwan is noisy. Colorful. And noisy.

Flags fly everywhere. Long vertical streams line every median, any inch of non-concrete. Billboards– happy, smiley, slogany– cover the dingy bareness of Taiwan’s concrete cityscape.

The sheer number of flags and billboards is astonishing. Prime location: Pedestrian overpasses. Yet, amazingly, I have never seen violence over this flagpole paradise. I would expect it in China, where people feel entitled to take and use without an inkling of concern for others. You see in the States, to an extent; one truck drives down the street plunging signs into the roadside and a half-mile back an opposing party truck crawls along plucking them out.

Translating the slogans splashed on this party paraphernalia is one of the little joys of my morning commute. They range from your run-of-the-mill “老经验,新活力” (roughly: Old experience, new energy), to the more cutesy “台湾的女儿” (Taiwan’s daughter), to the more emotive about children’s futures, safety, and new dreams.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

But above all, what makes Taiwanese elections so seemingly Chinese? Loudspeaker trucks.

Between signs and smells, it is tough to say which of the two senses faces a rougher transition when living in China or Taiwan. In Shanghai, I would awake to an old man on a bicycle riding through my neighborhood at 6am every morning. Strapped to his self-made bicycle/truck would be an old tape deck blaring (the amazingly invariable) prerecorded call for recycling of large household items… “冰箱!洗衣机!电视机!”

Taiwanese elections have the loudspeakers on bicycles and scooters, but mostly on vans. Larger than a golf cart and smaller than a Rav-4, these vans set cruise control to a snail’s pace and canvass city streets. Covered in decorative flags and miniature billboards, they boast the name, number, and slogan of their respective candidates. Through the loudspeaker, almost always indistinguishable over the clamor of traffic, the politician waxes on about issues essential to their election chances.

The stakes are increasing as election day nears. Today, a full parade of these vans, flanked by larger troop carrying trucks, inched its way down my street at lunch time. Scouts sprinted ahead of the platoon to lay explosive charges (fireworks?) along the road, a precursor to the drum-banging hootin’-and-hollerin’ of the battle-clad supporters in the back of the convoy.

The whole spectacle is part parade, part noise pollution– all exuberant.

It reminds me of when I saw a get-out-the-vote parade in Mozambique just prior to its 2005 presidential elections. A bunch of maniacs on scooters decked out with streamers and party flags raced through the streets of Maputo honking their horns. An armored Toyota Landcruiser took position in the middle of the mob. I happened to be on the street when the convoy screamed past. As I turned, shocked and fearful, I had just enough time to snap a blurred shot of eventual-winner Armando Guebuza propped out of the sunroof, waving with one hand and holding on for dear life with the other.

Democracy isn’t a one-size-fits-all. No one knows what democracy in China may one day resemble. But Taiwan is already the portrait of what peaceful, energetic, and progressive elections look like right in China’s backyard.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 76 other followers

%d bloggers like this: