Archive | International News RSS feed for this section

Best Blog Post of 2011

15 Nov

Bills. I still get them, but they're much more reasonable in Taiwan. For all utilities, including my cell phone, I pay about $55/month.

If you read only one article this year, it needs to be Matt Taibbi’s “How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the OWS Protests.”

Thousands of miles removed from the US and all its bullshit, I have had little interest in reading about the “Occupy Wall Street” movement. It’s not that I bought the “dirty, jobless hippies” line that interested parties eagerly attempt to apply to any protest of any sort.

It’s just that I didn’t care.

I’ve escaped the US, in part because I am strongly opposed to the direction of the country. My resentment starts at the (non-representative) government level, but, unfortunately, it casts its cloud as far as the average citizen.

I’m generally disgusted by the decisions and rationale of most Americans.

As I read Taibbi’s post, it all started to make sense…

We’re all born wanting the freedom to imagine a better and more beautiful future. But modern America has become a place so drearily confining and predictable that it chokes the life out of that built-in desire. Everything from our pop culture to our economy to our politics feels oppressive and unresponsive. We see 10 million commercials a day, and every day is the same life-killing chase for money, money and more money; the only thing that changes from minute to minute is that every tick of the clock brings with it another space-age vendor dreaming up some new way to try to sell you something or reach into your pocket. The relentless sameness of the two-party political system is beginning to feel like a Jacob’s Ladder nightmare with no end; we’re entering another turn on the four-year merry-go-round, and the thought of having to try to get excited about yet another minor quadrennial shift in the direction of one or the other pole of alienating corporate full-of-shitness is enough to make anyone want to smash his own hand flat with a hammer.

If you think of it this way, Occupy Wall Street takes on another meaning. There’s no better symbol of the gloom and psychological repression of modern America than the banking system, a huge heartless machine that attaches itself to you at an early age, and from which there is no escape. You fail to receive a few past-due notices about a $19 payment you missed on that TV you bought at Circuit City, and next thing you know a collector has filed a judgment against you for $3,000 in fees and interest. Or maybe you wake up one morning and your car is gone, legally repossessed by Vulture Inc., the debt-buying firm that bought your loan on the Internet from Chase for two cents on the dollar. This is why people hate Wall Street. They hate it because the banks have made life for ordinary people a vicious tightrope act; you slip anywhere along the way, it’s 10,000 feet down into a vat of razor blades that you can never climb out of.

That, to me, is what Occupy Wall Street is addressing. People don’t know exactly what they want, but as one friend of mine put it, they know one thing: FUCK THIS SHIT! We want something different: a different life, with different values, or at least a chance at different values.

Read it.

The banking system puts you in the corner early in life and never lets you out. It’s got you right where it wants you.

Which reminded me of something I wanted to post about under the “Pros of Taiwan”– no late fees.

No. Late. Fees.

I miss the deadline to pay for my cell phone, or my electric, or my rent? No fee.

The only inconvenience is that I can no longer pay at a 7-11 or any other convenient store. I have to hit the actual Taiwan Power Bureau, which I have done probably a dozen times. And even then, it’s walk in, walk out. No hassle.

I remember one time while in college back home, my banking account dipped below $250. It was something unimaginably marginal, like $249.47. Unbeknownst to me, I started getting hit with daily “insufficient funds” charges of $30, until the end of the month, when I received a bill stating I actually owed the bank $350. Amazingly, the entire time, my joint savings account was still flush with cash. But if it wasn’t for the fact that I personally knew the president of one of the bank branches, I would have been shit out of luck.

So, yeah. I might not know what I would build in place of the modern banking system. But I know enough that I am sick and tired of being bullied and treated like shit, all to add a few zeroes to some corporate asshole’s quarterly bonus.

I’m sick and tired of just the whole fucking culture of things.

OWS, here’s hoping you cats make some progress. And maybe, I’ll actually have an interest in returning to my motherland one of these years.

New Wikileaks cables highlight PRC v. ROC “No-Consensus Consensus”

8 Sep

To-may-to. To-mah-to. If you enjoying reading infuriatingly obfuscated political speak, you need to be following this Wikileaks/’92 Consensus story:

While President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has reiterated that the so-called “1992 consensus” was reached by Taiwan and China in 1992 to the effect that each side recognizes “one China, with each side having its own interpretation,” US cables recently released by WikiLeaks show that Chinese officials and academics clearly have a different understanding on what constitutes the “consensus.”

So, here’s how I see this– and I could be totally wrong. If I am, feel free to set me straight. But it goes something like this…

Way back in 1992, the PRC and ROC got together for a cross-strait chat. Both sides made their points, and it ended in the PRC basically telling the ROC to go fly a kite.

The KMT came out of this, hoping not to lose face politically, twisting it into a half-win. “Hey guys, no, don’t worry, we got this. Yeah, they’re cool, ya know, we just said, ‘Yeah, you got your story. We’ve got ours,’ but everything is cool.”

This lunacy was further wrenched, wringing out the obvious truth, into a nice, dry political buzz word: “the 1992 Consensus”– a.k.a. “The No-Consensus Consensus.”

Because, as far as China is concerned, then and now, there is nothing to discuss: There is one China. It is controlled and governed by the PRC. Taiwan is a province of that country. The PRC is allowing a local government of that province to play some meaningless game of political charades before it all ends in an ultimate unification.

Taiwan is the little grandchild tugging on Grandpa China’s pantleg. Sort of annoying, but he’s just letting it slide because, hey, it’s family, and he’s got a lot invested in it carrying on the bloodline.

That’s how China sees it. There is no agree-to-disagree here. It’s a “disagree-to-agree-to-disagree.” See how that works?

President Ma and the KMT keep hammering this “1992 Consensus” line like a whack-a-mole game, and I just don’t get it. First of all, how has this been spun as consensus? Or an accomplishment? Or a legit policy stance?

Do I think either party in Taiwan has a much stronger leg to stand on? Eh, not really. But this whole “consensus” mumbojumbo is for the birds.

Yeah, the PRC kind of has the ROC by the balls here. But hey, that’s what happens when you lose a civil war in a continent-sized country and retreat to a tiny little island. The window to announce independence probably closed in the early 1970s.

What can be done now? Well, hopefully something a little more creative and constructive than basing the most important policy you have on agreeing to disagree, and not even really at that.

What does shark fin soup taste like?

7 Sep

Nothing. Bland. Noodly.

I’ve never tried it. Never wanted to. But it’s what I have always heard. I have friends who have tried it, friends whose families believe it will bring them good luck if they slurp a bowl down on special occasions. They tell me the same thing: tasteless (literally and figuratively, I may add).

My friend just posted the below video on Facebook. It’s a segment of a Channel 4 documentary called Shark Bait hosted by celebrity chef Gordon Ramsey that aired about 6 months ago. I’d never heard of it, let alone seen it. Part of it takes place here in Taiwan, and it’s something everyone should see…

Now, this documentary didn’t air without controversy. Someone dug up, or made a pretty penny, photos and a video of Ramsey shark fishing off the coast of Florida about a year prior. He can be seen high-fiving people after catching a couple of massive sharks, which he apparently intended on mounting as trophies.

Now, granted, after watching a season of Hell’s Kitchen (especially in comparison to my personal favorite, Masterchef Australia), I’ve always thought Ramsey to be a pompous twat. Still, his ego should not detract from the issue at hand: sharks fin soup needs to be banished to the history books.

I am pro-shark, all the way, baby. Hell, I loved Greg Norman. Granted, there may be nothing that scares me more than sharks, but I am in awe of the species. To have survived so long, to be such an adapted killing machine, a dinosaur of modern times– sharks deserve our humble reverence.

No more shark fin soup. It sucks anyway.

(@Vanessa– Thanks, again.)

What the latest financial crisis says about the US & China

9 Aug

Fantastic piece on The Economist’s Free Exchange blog, “Downgrading our politics.” In it, the author touches on the broader implications of political ineptitude, not economic policy, slowly shifting the balance of power from Washington to Beijing.

I never had much sympathy for the view that America’s economy was about to be eclipsed by China’s, and the main reason was our political institutions. Those checks, balances and laws provide an orderly means to change course in response to new challenges. China’s authoritarianism deprives the government of a feedback mechanism to tell it when it is meeting the needs and aspirations of its people. That makes its system intrinsically fragile.

Events of the last few weeks have forced me to reconsider. While the crash of a high-speed train highlighted many of China’s ongoing weaknesses, it also revealed, in the vigorous reporting and commentary that followed in print and online, a nascent apparatus of accountability. Conversely, America’s ostensible success in avoiding default in fact highlighted the growing dysfunction of its political institutions.  If these events are portents of things to come, then the day when China displaces America as the world’s economic superpower is closer than I thought.

Are Taiwanese “Chinese”?

9 Aug

 

Was this built by Chinese? I don't think so, bro. -Photo c/o Nick Colony

A while back I mentioned how the DPP and local media had started in on how President Ma Ying-jeou chooses to term his nationality. Well, it’s made the headlines again in a recent Taipei Times op-ed, “To be or not to be Taiwanese or Chinese.”

 

President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is in full electioneering mode…

One can imagine his soul shrieking as he uttered ["I am Taiwanese"], but when he said it in English he chose not to use the word “Formosan” or the word that came into common usage in the 1960s, “Taiwanese.”

Instead he declared himself to be an “R.O.C.er,” an invented phrase that is neither here nor there, a play on Republic of China (ROC), which could also be pronounced like “rocker.”

So besides the witty wordplay, there is some substance to the semantics. The author is as obviously anti-Ma as they come, but he brings up some interesting points.

The real question is where the small minority who consider themselves to be “Chinese” get off accusing people who say they are Taiwanese of “mincing words over ethnicity.”

There are people out there who think they are really smart, who believe that this distinction is not really all that important, imagining themselves to be something in-between, or simultaneously Chinese and Taiwanese.

This is simply not the case. Whether you call yourself Chinese or Taiwanese is of huge significance in an international sense.

Now, to impart my 五毛 on this, I have found national identity much more difficult to label since returning from China to Taiwan.

It may come from my time working in the Shanghai media, where a simple cross-strait slip of the tongue could end your career.

It may come from my intimate knowledge of the two judicial systems vis-a-vis immigration.

It may come from my friendships with both Chinese and Taiwanese, who I consider to be equally fantastic but intrinsically different people.

Either way, my reluctance to mislabel someone has caused me to start saying things like “ABT” (American-born Taiwanese) instead of “ABC.”

It’s made me more disinclined to utter “the mainland” in conversation.

It’s made me cringe when fellow foreign teachers talk about their “Chinese co-teachers.”

It’s made me realize 国语 (guoyu) and 普通话 (putonghua) are neither one in the same, nor should anyone ever say they speak “Chinese.”

So, in many ways, I agree with the author here. There is international significance and certain ramifications when defining oneself as Taiwanese, or vice versa.

I wouldn’t base my campaign on it, but it makes for an interesting trip to the water cooler.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 76 other followers

%d bloggers like this: